How did the Vascular Priority Setting Partnership agree the priorities?
The Vascular Priority Setting Partnership publication (PDF) has been published and details the background, methodology and results of the Vascular PSP in full. A summary of the process is provided here (PDF) and outlined below.
The Vascular PSP was undertaken in three main phases;
- Delphi Survey: an initial Delphi survey to gather the opinions of vascular health care professionals about their research priorities.
- A James Lind Alliance (JLA) survey to gather the opinions of vascular patients and carers about their research priorities.
- Final workshops to bring together patient and healthcare professional priorities to jointly agree research priorities.
Phase one: clinician Delphi survey summary
The aim was to survey the opinions of vascular health care professionals, to identify and rank research priorities using a modified Delphi methodology.
A full description of this phase of the project has been published:
G E Smith, J Long, T Wallace, D Carradice, I C Chetter, Vascular Research Collaborative , Identifying the research priorities of healthcare professionals in UK vascular surgery: modified Delphi approach, BJS Open, Volume 5, Issue 2, March 2021, zraa025, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa025
Phase two: patient and carer survey with the James Lind Alliance
Following the success of the vascular health care professional Delphi survey, the Vascular Priority Setting Partnership worked in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance to identify and score patients and carers research priorities.
1. Vascular Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group
The Steering Group (PDF) is made up of representatives from vascular health care professions, service users and carers. This group agrees the plan of action, scope and takes responsibility for the PSP.
2. Gathering priorities
We ran a survey inviting anyone with a vascular condition, their carers or family to submit research priorities.
3. Establishing Special Interest Groups
The term vascular covers such a broad range of conditions, we established Special Interest Groups to help support and promote the project in these areas, ensuring different types of vascular condition were fairly represented throughout this process.
Each SIG has its own membership comprising allied health professionals (surgeons, nurses, radiologists, technologists, trainees, physiotherapists) and patients.
4. Sorting the responses and evidence checking
With oversight from the steering group, a team from the Vascular Research Group sorted all the priorities and worked with the Special Interest Groups to group the responses into vascular condition areas.
The long list of summary questions were checked against existing research evidence to ensure they were true uncertainties. Any priorities that were already answered by research were removed.
Overarching summary priorities were agreed and put forward to the next round of survey for scoring.
5. Scoring priorities
We ran a second survey and invited patients and carers to select their vascular area/s of interest and to score the priorities within this area using a Likert scale (Extremely Important to Not at all Important or Don’t know).
Phase three: final Special Interest Groups workshops
Final prioritisation workshops took place between January and September 2021. The nine Special Interest Groups held individual workshops to agree on their 'top ten' list of research priorities.
Following James Lind Alliance recommendations, work was undertaken by each Special Interest Group in advance to agree on a final combined shortlist of clinician and patient priorities to be discussed at the workshops. Where clinician priorities and patient priorities overlapped, the patient priority was put forward.
Due to the ongoing risk of COVID-19, face-to-face workshops were not possible, however the James Lind Alliance adapted their process to deliver the workshops online via Zoom. Each workshop was facilitated by the Vascular Priority Setting Partnership lead James Lind Alliance advisor and followed the James Lind Alliance methodology, using a Nominal Group Technique to generate discussion, ranking, consensus and agreement.